澳大利亚新闻网 - 澳大利亚新闻 - 澳大利亚中国新闻门户 | Australia Chinese News Portal

 找回密码

搜索
ACNW QR CODE
ACNW WECHAT QR CODE

中美史上首次主播约辩,美国专家怎么看?

2019-5-31 06:07| 发布者: yan | 评论: 0 |来自: 北京周报

导读: 5月30日8点26分26秒,中国CGTN主播刘欣与美国FOX主播翠西•里根就中美贸易战展开隔空辩论。


这是中美史上首次主播约辩,可谓“仙女打架”!约辩结果如何?欣姐姐表现如何?看美国专家如何辣评!

美国人的傲慢与偏见


直播结束后,里根直呼:“太奇怪了!刘欣说她不是中共党员。据我所知,如果不是中共党员,根本不能从事这么重要的工作,否则会立即被逮起来。(You should be arrested immediately if you don’t subscribe to Party belief.)”

难道这就是美国专业媒体人对中国的认知?


为了给自己找补一下,里根随后采访了鼓吹“中国威胁论”的鹰派人士、美国哈德逊研究中心中国战略研究主任白邦瑞(Michael Pillsbury)。

白邦瑞笑着纠正里根说,也不至于被抓起来吧。不过你很有礼貌,辩词很有料。“You are very polite, you had a lot of substance.”( 之前,欣姐姐质疑里根说话没有“真凭实据”)

美国女主播:从“唯有一战”到“无人想战”


5月14日,里根叫嚣,中国的繁荣是“以美国利益为代价,” 责怪中国人从美国人那里“偷走”了数十亿美元——按她的话说,“我们别无选择”,唯有一“战”。

今天,里根抛出了一连串尖锐的问题:

1、中国都第二大经济体了,什么时候才能不装穷?

2、中国是否盗窃了美国的知识产权?

3、零关税不是挺好吗?

4、如何界定中国的“国家资本主义”?

我们的欣姐姐见招拆招,各个击破,思维缜密,表达流畅!

经过今日一辩,里根终于承认:没有人想要打贸易战(Nobody wants a trade war)。

约辩之后,《北京周报》第一时间采访了美国圣托马斯大学中国问题专家高乔恩(Jon Taylor),看看他如何点评!
“虽然整体基调相对愉快,但里根起初想设置刘欣的中共党员身份,结果被打脸,效果适得其反。刘欣立刻更正,说自己不是党员,只是代表自己说话。”

While the overall tone was relatively pleasant, it was quite counterproductive for Regan to introduce Liu as a CPC member — and to do such in what appeared to be an accusatory tone. For her part, Liu demonstrated a cool demeanor by correcting Regan's claim by insisting that she speaks on behalf of herself.

“在此次辩论中,双方讨论了许多实质性问题,从知识产权到华为再到中美贸易。刘欣很善于发现,她立刻指出中国80%的就业岗位和出口由私营企业创造。她还说,关税的设置是多边决定的,并不一定是两个政府之间的事,这一点也非常正确。”

And there were substantive issues addressed in the debate, ranging from intellectual property issues to Huawei to trade. Liu was really good in observing that 80% of Chinese employees and 80% of Chinese exports are from private industry. She also rightly noted that tariffs are decided multilaterally, not necessarily between two governments alone.

“不出所料,她们几乎在所有议题上,都意见相左。但此次辩论,让美国观众真正有机会听到中方对这些问题的看法。”

While, as expected, they pretty much disagreed on everything, the debate offered U.S. viewers the chance to actually hear the Chinese side of the issues.

“我认为,刘欣表现得非常出色。无论是在问还是答中,都表现得相当自信。”

I think that Liu Xin did a very good job by demonstrating great confidence in both her questions and answers.

“令人沮丧的是,刘欣没能向里根发问。里根屡次向刘欣追问,搞得后者就像是国务院新闻办公室发言人一样。”

I was frustrated that Liu Xin couldn't ask Trish Regan any questions. Regan asked questions that forced Liu Xin to respond as if she was working for the State Council Information Office.


刘欣在随后在CGTN邹悦的访谈中回应说:我本来也不想把这次交锋说成是辩论,因为辩论需要有独立的第三方,有个计时器,你说完后我来说。我希望这是一个交流“a chat”,不要那么咄咄逼人。

相关阅读

热门新闻 Hot
关闭

友情推荐上一条 /3 下一条

手机版|Archiver| 澳洲新闻在线  

Copyright © 2012 - 2020 | All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Website Design Sydney

返回顶部